Monday, 17 May 2021

A Samurai Visits the Pope

 

In 1565 a Spanish ship discovered the return route from the Philippines to Acapulco in Mexico. Thus began 250 years of Spanish trade and contact with Manila, and from there with the rest of Asia. Not long after, the King in Madrid began to receive reports of a nation of fiercesome warriors – the Japanese.

 

On 29 May 1592 the Governor of the Philippines, Gómez Pérez Dasmariñas, heard that a Japanese ship carrying ambassadors from the “King of Japon” had anchored in Manila’s harbour. On 31 May the ambassadors delivered to him a “letter from that king, enclosed in a box of wood one and one-half varas in length and painted white. Inside this was another box of the same proportions, excellently painted, varnished, and polished in black, with some medium-sized gilded iron rings and some large cords of red silk. Within this box was another one painted in various colors—yellow and gold—with its large iron rings and cords of white and violet silk, both covered with damask. In this third box, wrapped in a stout, wide paper, painted and gilded, was the letter, written with Chinese characters in the Japanese language, on stout paper, illumined and gilded with great neatness. The letter is even larger than the sealed bulls from Rroma, on parchment, and is sealed with two painted seals stamped in red.” The letter coolly informed Dasmariñas that Japan planned to invade Great China, and the Japanese king had been minded to attack Manila on his fleet’s way to China. Instead, the monarch invited Dasmariñas to send an ambassador in sign of friendship, otherwise “I shall unfurl my banner and send an army against that country to conquer it with a multitude of men”.

 

Eleven years later, a group of captive Spanish mariners were directing the construction of a ship at Tsukinoura, a little more than 400km north of modern Tokyo. The Japanese had the shipbuilding knowhow to sail the seas as far south as the Philippines, but they did not know how to build a vessel that could withstand the rigours of a journey across the Pacific, still less did they have the navigational expertise successfully to reach Spanish territory in Acapulco. As the price of their freedom the Spaniards in Tsukinoura had been ordered to build a ship and to sail for Acapulco. Aboard would be an embassy from the shōgun Tokugawa Ieyasu. One of the ambassadors was a samurai, Hasekura Rokuemon (1571-1622), a member of the gun corps of Lord Date Masamune. Hasekura would be absent from Japan for seven years, during which time he and his companions were the first Japanese to cross the Pacific to Acapulco, where he arrived on 28 January 1614, to visit Mexico, to sail from Veracruz to Seville, to secure an audience with the Spanish King in Madrid and to meet the Pope in Rome. Given the technologies of the day and the perils of such a journey, Hasekura would be counted one of the most extraordinary travellers in history, were it not for the fact that remarkably little is reliably known about his embassy and its consequences.

 

Replica of the San Juan Bautista, in which Hasekura crossed the Pacific, Ishinomaki, Japan

The air of mystery that surrounds the story of Hasekura attracted the Japanese novelist Shusaku Endō (1923-1956) to write his brilliant novel, The Samurai. Working with the scant historical facts, and a visit to Mexico in 1974 when he travelled from the Pacific coast to the Atlantic, Endō imagines how Hasekura and his three fellow samurai ambassadors must have felt and acted in response to unimaginable events, peoples and places. Since I finished the novel a few weeks ago, I have been thinking about the similarities and differences between the work of the historian and a historical novelist. All historians work with sources that are, to a greater or lesser extent, incomplete and apply their imagination to reconstruct a credible view of the past, but a historian who stretches imagination too far will be criticized. The skill of the novelist is to stretch imagination much further, but nevertheless to convincingly construct characters of the period that have a ring of truth and events that transport the reader to unfamiliar places. In this respect Endō’s novel succeeds briliantly.

 

On the journey across the Pacific the ship is enveloped for days in a thick fog that renders the instruments by which sailors navigated useless, and wracked by violent storms of the kind that not infrequently sank Spanish galleons. One of Hasekura’s faithful servants is crushed to death by falling cargo when seawater floods the hold. In the close confines of a crowded wooden ship the Japanese are repelled by the foul stink of the Spaniards. It was common knowledge in Spain that the despised Jews and Muslims bathed frequently. It was therefore an expression of Christian faith not to bathe. To stink was to be holy. The samurai gaze in wonder at a school of whales. Hasekura “watched motionlessly until at length the whales disappeared on the horizon. Rays of sunlight seeped through the clouds like sheaves of arrows, markedly tinging the edge of the now-deserted ocean with silver. It had never occurred to the samurai that there were so many new and different things to experience. He had not realized the world was so vast. His Lordship’s domain had been the only world of which he could conceive. But now a subtle transformation was taking place in his heart, and with it came a vague uneasiness and a formless fear.”

 

Hasekura in Rome 1615, attributed to Claude Deruet

For those who know something of the times and places that Endō depicts there are some minor missteps. When the “battered ship … now scarcely more than a hulk” finally reaches Acapulco it anchors in the inlet – in fact, ships anchored in Acapulco’s capacious bay. And the hills are covered in strange olive trees – in fact, the Pacific coast would have been covered in tropical forest; there was not an olive tree for thousands of miles. On the journey to Mexico City the samurai ambassadors and the scheming, ambitious Franciscan friar who accompanies them as an interpreter, spend the night in the village of Iguala (a real place) but avoid Taxco (another real place) when they notice in the mountains along the way smoke signals sent up by Indians still hostile to the Spaniards. This is very fanciful stuff imported from American westerns. In Endō’s imagination, the samurai enter Mexico City through the gate of a walled city. Although it is true that Spanish cities in the New World were modelled on the European cities from which they came, they had no walls and gates. Indeed, at this time Mexico City was located on an island in a great lake and connected to the mainland by long causeways that were easily defended. So walls and gates were not needed.

 

Endō’s challenge was to imagine very different societies - feudal Japan, colonial New Spain (as Mexico was known at the time), Spain and Italy. The opening chapters are set in a Japan ruled by daimyōs (feudal lords) to whom a samurai like Hosegawa owed allegiance and military service in return for the Lord’s favour and access to land. When summoned by his Lord he hurries to comply and humbles himself in the presence of his superior. Even a lowly samurai like Hosegawa in turn had servants and families who depended on his protection and land. Endō interprets the foundational institution of Spanish colonial rule, the encomienda as the equivalent of the daimyo system, describing the encomenderos of New Spain as feudal landed lords. In fact, they had rights to Indian labour and tribute, but no access to their encomienda’s land, and the Indians' obligations to their encomendero were limited by law, not feudal ties of loyalty.

 

In New Spain Hosegawa and his companions encounter a strange culture which they struggle to interpret, especially since their only interpreter is the scheming Spanish friar Velasco who tells the Japanese only what suits his own ends. Velasco tells the Japanese merchants who travelled to New Spain in search of profit that they will be allowed to do business there only if they become Christians. One of the Japanese tells Velasco that it makes no difference to most Japanese whether there is a God or not. “If the merchants on this ship are able to make money in Nueva España, they will probably become Christians. But if they find there is no profit in it, they will abandon your religion in an instant.” Nevertheless, Velasco arranges for the merchants to be baptized by the Archbishop of Mexico in a grand ceremony in the city’s cathedral. Hosegawa cannot understand how Spaniards could worship a miserable, emaciated man tortured on a cross. No man could owe allegiance to such a powerless figure. Moreover, the samurai felt bound by his duty to his lord Date Masamune to refuse offers of conversion.

 

The Japanese envoys are taken to meet the Spanish Viceroy who offers them his hand. But the Japanese are so busy bowing low that they do not notice the Viceroy’s gesture. Endō writes: “The contrast between this Japanese style of greeting and the Viceroy’s bombastic welcoming speech, done in typical Spanish fashion, made an amusing spectacle. Although essentially these two nationalities are utterly dissimilar, they are alike in their respect for formality and in their exaggerated mannerisms.” When I was in Japan on publishing business, it had often occurred to me that my student life in Mexico, with its respect for titles and hierarchy and formal methods of greeting, was a good training for the complex formalities of Japanese business and social life. Endō evidently formed a similar impression of Mexican society.

 

Diego Fernández de Córdoba, Viceroy of New Spain when Hasekura was there

Hosekawa and his fellow ambassadors journey on to Spain. In Madrid they meet the King who is suspicious of the motives of the Japanese. He has heard of the persecution of Christians in Japan and shows no interest in a commercial treaty. Desperate to save his mission, Velasco persuades the Japanese ambassadors that their mission will succeed only if they become Christians. Reluctantly, Hosekawa and his companions agree. Velasco then takes the Japanese to Rome where, on 3 November 1615 they have an inconsequential meeting with the Pope, who has also been informed of Japan’s persecution of Christians. His mission a wretched failure, Hosekawa undertakes the long journey back to Japan. He reached Manila in 1618 only to receive orders that he was to remain there until further notice. He finally received permission to return to his home in 1620.

 

Felipe III by Andrés López Polanco, c.1617

In Endō’s novel, Hosekawa’s reward for loyalty to his lord and seven years away from home, is execution for the crime of conversion to Christianity. In fact, his fate is not certain. Some traditions record that he renounced his new faith, others that he clung to it and was ordered to die. A letter of 1640 claims that Hasekura’s son Gonshirō furtively observed Christian rites, a crime for which Hasekura's eldest son Kanzaburō, guilty of tolerance, was ordered to disembowel himself. Endō’s novel is a superb exercise in historical imagination. Hosekawa’s adventure is a tragic tale of loyalty betrayed by scheming feudal lords and an ambitious cleric.

 

Pope Paul V, who met Hasekura in Rome

Note: I am grateful to Professor Van C. Gessel for supplying information about Endō and Hasekura in the Postscript to his excellent translation of the novel and in an email. Quotes from the novel are from Professor Gessel’s translation (Penguin Classics 1980).

 

Sunday, 9 May 2021

Which government wants to control what we know and think?

 

Reminder: to continue to receive automatic notifications of blog posts

 

On 31 July Google will no longer automatically send you emails to tell you there is something new to read on my blog. If you would like to continue to be alerted to new posts by email please send me a message headed “Notifications of blog” to:

ianjacobsipswich@gmail.com

 

I recently came across a statement concerning museum displays and exhibitions. One sentence, in particular caught my eye. “Publicly funded bodies have a duty to operate in a way which is impartial and not motivated by activism or politics.” I wonder how many of you could guess what government made this statement. Could it be the authoritarian government of Hungary, or perhaps Poland? Might it be the government of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Turkey, or perhaps of Vladimir Putin in Russia?

 

Could it possibly be the government of my own country, ruled by the oldest Parliamentary system in the world? After all, that same government recently proposed to appoint a ‘free speech champion’ to investigate possible infringements of free speech on university campuses. Well, yes. The statement was issued to The Guardian by the Department for Culture Media and Sport. The full statement reads:

“Publicly funded bodies have a duty to operate in a way which is impartial and not motivated by activism or politics. The government’s policy of ‘retain and explain’ on issues of contested heritage fully respects the independence of museums and galleries, as the chair of the National Museum Directors’ Council has acknowledged.” [For a previous piece on this subject see A Threat to Freedom of Expression That is Too Close for Comfort, published on 28 February 2021 at https://ianjacobsipswich.blogspot.com/]

 

The government has proposed a new law to protect “20,000 statues and monuments throughout England for future generations.” “The new legal protections mean that historic statues should be ‘retained and explained’ for future generations. Individuals who want to remove any historic statue, whether listed or not, will now require listed building consent or planning permission.” At first sight, this might be a reasonable proposal to address contemporary concerns about monuments to men (almost invariably men) who, for example, were involved in the slave trade or who were oppressive colonialists. However, this measure is part of a much broader concerted campaign to position the government as the patriotic defender of our British heritage from activists who, we are warned, want to ‘rewrite’ history.

 

Similarly, the Secretary of State for Education, Gavin Williamson, a man who appears to have little understanding of education, has announced that a free speech champion will be appointed to investigate infringements of free speech in higher education. Universities UK, the body that represents UK universities, noted: “There are already significant legal duties placed on universities to uphold freedom of speech and universities are required to have a code of practice on free speech and to update this regularly.” Mr Williamson appears to believe that free speech in under assault by “activism or politics” and that universities are unable to define and sustain free speech – so the government will do that for them.

 

The real consequences of the government’s war against activism and politics is already apparent. Oliver Dowden, the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport recently refused to reappoint as a trustee of the Royal Museums Greenwich Dr Aminul Hoque, whose work “focuses on issues of multicultural Britain, identity, social justice, youth policy, religion, race relations and Islamic feminism.” The chair of the Royal Museums, the billionaire Sir Charles Dunstone, hardly a radical political activist, resigned in protest. And the history of science author Sarah Dry withdrew her application to be reappointed as a trustee of the Science Museum Group because she was asked, as a condition of reappointment, to support the government’s retain and explain policy. Trustees can hardly be independent if they are required to support government policy.

 

Meanwhile, Mr Williamson has decided that funding for “high-cost subject funding for other price group C1 subjects – that is, for courses in performing and creative arts, media studies and archaeology” should be reduced from £36 million per year to £19 million. These, it seems, are not “strategic priorities”. Perhaps those who study these subjects are too political or activist for Mr Williamson’s taste.

 

Museums and universities thrive on independent scholarship and education, presented without fear of interference from government or other special interests. Government diktats are to be expected in countries ruled by dictators, not in the United Kingdom. Mr Williamson may be a fool, but his colleagues in government are not. This is the government that “Got Brexit done”. It is now reinforcing its political support by protecting those who “wanted their country back” from nasty activists out to denigrate their history. To undermine the independence of our museums and universities in pursuit of such a shallow self-serving political agenda is shameful.

Sunday, 2 May 2021

Disability and creativity: Parkinsons performers, poets and playwrights

 

Important: to continue to receive automatic notifications of blog posts

 

On 31 July Google will no longer automatically send you emails to tell you there is something new to read on my blog. If you would like to continue to be alerted to new posts by email please send me a message headed “Notifications of blog” to:

ianjacobsipswich@gmail.com

 

My sister Tricia says that she was told at school that she could not sing. So she never did – until much later in life when she was diagnosed with Parkinsonism. Like most people, all I knew of Parkinsons was that it makes people tremble, sometimes violently, and that those who suffer it can be intimidated and embarrassed because they cannot control their bodies as others can. In fact, the physical effects of the condition are much greater, since it can affect muscle control in any part of the body, including muscles that enable us to breath, to speak – or to dance or sing.

 

Well, the girl who could not sing has discovered that, indeed she can. And that she can dance, perform in public, contribute to creative projects, and to address doctors and researchers about the beneficial effects of singing and dance for people with Parkinsons. All because of Parkinsons.

 

The East Suffolk Skylarks choir of people living with Parkinsons rehearsing at Snape Maltings.

A few years ago, Tricia heard that a musician called Amy Mallett had organized two choral groups for people with Parkinsons, their spouses and families, one in Ipswich and the other at Snape Maltings (home of the Aldeburgh Festival established by Benjamin Britten and Peter Pears). Amy is a composer, theatre-maker and arts-health practitioner. Jan and I first saw Amy and her Suffolk choir in action in 2019 at Snape, and at Aldeburgh, nearby on the coast. The choir had gathered at Snape on a bitterly cold, windy coastal Suffolk day for a final rehearsal before performing a programme of sea shanties on a beach bandstand as part of the Aldeburgh Festival. We watched Amy take them through their warm-up exercises, important to maintain as much muscle tone and lung function as possible, and then rehearse their songs. We learned that, although the vocal abilities of the performers varied, that did not matter because the group sang for one another as well as for their audience. So, if one singer missed a note, or could not summon the strength to sing, the team covered for that performer.

 

Tricia in the rehearsal room at Snape

At the end of the rehearsal, Amy told the group that she was concerned that the harsh weather might pose too big a risk to the performers, but that she would let the group decide. Hands were raised and the performance went ahead. Suffolk weather would not stop this choir’s moment on the stage. We all boarded a bus for Aldeburgh. Even a North Sea wind did not deter them as it carried their songs along the shingle beach. Their excitement at performing for an audience was inspiring.

 

Boarding the bus to Aldeburgh

Celebrating success on a windy beach

Tricia told us that Amy and her collaborators Nicola Wydenbach, an operatic soprano and Director of Training for Sing to Beat Parkinsons; Danielle Teale, a dancer and founder of Dancing with Parkinsons; and Sarah Lewis, a dancer and yoga teacher and co-director of Glass House Dance, were planning an opera-dance-performance piece.

 

The subject was the life of Margaret Catchpole (1762-1819), a domestic servant born in Suffolk. While she was working for Elizabeth Cobbold, a member of a wealthy Ipswich brewing family, Margaret fell in love with a sailor-smuggler William Laud. Margaret must have been quite a lady, since two men, William Laud and John Barry, fought for her affections. Literally fought, since Laud shot Barry and became a fugitive. In 1797 Margaret stole one of the Cobbold’s horses and rode it to London where she had heard Laud was living. She was arrested and sentenced to death, a sentence that was commuted to transportation to the Australian penal colony for seven years. Nothing daunted, Margaret escaped from Ipswich gaol, but was arrested again three years later on a Suffolk beach. Again sentenced to death, again commuted to transportation, Margaret arrived in Sydney in December 1801. She prospered and remained in Australia until her death. Her letters are important documents of the history of Australia.

 

The process by which this work was created is unusual. Many creative types are fiercely egocentric and determined that their work be their own. To the contrary, the Margaret Catchpole project was been a collaboration between the members of the Suffolk and London groups and Amy, Nicola, Danielle and Sarah. All – performers and professional musicians and dancers   have contributed ideas and have participated in writing the work.

 

The plan had been for the two Suffolk groups to team up with a similar choir in London to perform the opera at the Royal Opera House. Covid-19 scuppered these plans, and for a time activity ceased. This was a great setback for the Parkinsons performers. Tricia told me that her lung function deterioratedduring lockdown because she had stopped singing. But nothing daunted Amy, Nicola, Danielle and Sarah, formed a Community Interest Company to continue the work begun in Ipswich, Snape and London, CARVEcoLAB. The website is:https://www.carvecolab.com/

 

Rehearsals and creativity have continued via Zoom. One of the products of this artistic collaboration is a digital quilt, HerStory: Ev’ry Stitch in the Quilt. There is a video that tells the story of the creation of the quilt here:

 


 

 

The quilt is available at:

 

https://www.carvecolab.com/herstory-ev-ry-stitch-in-the-quilt 

 

I encourage you to explore the quilt, click on the squares and enjoy the work of Tricia and her fellow performers. Tricia’s contributions are the embroidered vase of flowers on the left and the image of sailing barges bottom right (our maternal grandfather was a sailing barge captain), but please to explore as many squares as you like.

The squares of the digital quilt look like this